AI Insights

Who Priced In What In Their Stock Market Trades?

by Plotinus Plotinus No Comments

The Federal Reserve meeting this month was keenly awaited to see if the hardline message on inflation control materialized into the expected 75bps rate increase or the less probable 100bps. It was the indeed the former, accompanied by a strong message of staying the course to control inflation long-term, at the cost of short-term pain.

This was all very much in line with expectations. Yet, by the end of the week, after the dust settled on the announcement, the major US indices were down significantly: the Dow dropped -3.6%, the S&P 500 -4.2% and the NASDAQ -3.8%. The rate rise matched the consensus figure and not the more concerning 100bps increase. The Fed’s messaging has been consistent, from Jerome Powell’s Jackson Hole speech to his interview at the Cato Institute earlier in the month. So, there really were no surprises. This however leaves a question, was this information not properly priced in?

It wasn’t that the markets were blithe to the economic storm clouds ahead; a day prior to the announcement the three major indices were in the red month to date. What “caused” the penny to drop belatedly, so to speak? The markets are, of course, prone to volatile reactions, so it is always interesting to examine instances where these exaggerations supersede grounded consensus expectations and drive the market.

Dealing With Market Irrationality and Determining the Relevance of Data

From an event-based decision perspective, prior to the event there was uncertainty, despite the Fed having telegraphed its intentions more than usual. Post the event, that information ended up being correct, and to a large extent not particularly helpful, in that the market fell in a manner that would have been in keeping with worse news than that which correctly identified the rate hike. In data terms it was good data but of questionable utility.

In data analysis there is much focus placed on data quality, particularly when any inferences to be drawn from that data are consequential. Unfortunately, determining the relevance of that data is a whole other issue. If all was clearly causal; A, therefore B, therefore C, then investment decisions would be rather simple. The reality in investment decision-making is that this is rarely, if ever, the case. Instead, the illogical conundrum can occur, where data can be of good quality, the inference (the signal deduced from that data) can be logical and the end decision to act on that signal be completely wrong.

When Artificial Intelligence is being used to perform this type of analysis the usual response to this situation is to conclude that the information was lacking and therefore (logically) more information is required—hence the use of “Big Data,” where quality is replaced by quantity in the hope of getting the right answer. The problem with this approach is that it fails to take account of the irrational. If the deficiency of the signal is due in part to some illogical reason, then pumping all the data of the day at it will not make any improvement except by pure chance.

Go Beyond Big Data

At Plotinus we recognized that in order to build a successful AI trade decision-making strategy we had to embrace the aspects of irrationality contained in the market, not foolishly try to impose hard logic as though we were dealing with a mechanistic system.

To tackle this, we have chosen to use a Derived Data approach rather than use Big Data. In so doing our emphasis is on understanding the relevance of the data inputs we are using and how our AI modeling uses them to determine its signal from these inputs. In so doing our AI trade decision-making aims to encompass the knowledge that the market will at times defy logic. By seeking to integrate this into an investment trade decision-making strategy we believe there is the potential to have a more robust approach for identifying more statistically significant separation of signals from noise that can help the investor deal more consistently with a market full of incomplete information.

Investors always have to make investment decisions based on less than complete information, and seek to separate signal from noise. With the S&P 500 recently finishing at a 2022 low, and the Dow dipping into Bear market territory, prudent investors, looking ahead to the new quarter and coming year, may want to make efforts to better understand the relevance of the data inputs they use in making trade decisions, and to seek how they might include this to better manage their stock market exposures.

© 2022 Plotinus Asset Management. All rights reserved.
Unauthorized use and/or duplication of any material on this site without written permission is prohibited.

Image Credit: Lunamarina at Can Stock Photo.

Summertime and the Living Is Queasy

by Plotinus Plotinus No Comments

The beginning of summer has brought with it a bear market and much uncertainty with the looming prospect of a US and global recession.

The Dow and S&P 500 ended basically flat for May, but those month-end figures belied the brewing unease that was reflected in a turbulent month for the markets. For the S&P 500 to end the month flat, for example, required that it recover from hitting a May 20 low of -8%. Alas, the month-end was but a temporary respite as the market fall reinvigorated itself with the start of June.

Read more

The Geopolitical Chimera

by Plotinus Plotinus No Comments

The Russian invasion of Ukraine is the most profound challenge to date of the post-Cold War world order. With the looming specter of what an expanded conflagration might potentially mean, there has been a very heavy de-escalatory stance by the West, most specifically by NATO members, that would probably be best described as anti-brinksmanship. President Joe Biden’s pledge to defend “every inch of NATO territory” can be taken as the current, literal demarcation line, where threat will be met with threat. Until that line is reached, threat will be met with acceptance (sanctions, military support, and condemnation of humanitarian atrocities).

Read more

Sobering Times

by Plotinus Plotinus No Comments

Regardless of all the unknowns associated with war there is one absolute certainty, profound human suffering.

As is oft the case, conflict-at-a-remove, produces endless, expert speculation and prognostication on the current and future pattern of the war and its geopolitical and economic ramifications. So, rather than add to that speculative melee, with our take on the investment implications of the conflict, we would prefer to reflect on how the current Russian invasion of Ukraine has highlighted how fragile the interpretation of information can be.

Read more

Winter Discontent

by Plotinus Plotinus No Comments

January was a tumultuous month, the major US indices all posting their worst month since the pandemic fallout of March 2020 despite a last-minute claw back in the final trading days of the month. The Federal Reserve’s confirmation of its first interest rate raise since the emergency accommodation due to the pandemic, in a way could be seen to mark the end of the pandemic era for the broad US stock market. The S&P 500’s -5.3% loss alone, does not tell the whole story of January. On two separate occasions the intraday low put the index in sub -10% correction territory.

Read more

Embracing Uncertainty

by Plotinus Plotinus No Comments

Perhaps the most resounding investment theme thus far for 2022 is uncertainty. Concern regarding this uncertainty has been amplified by the faltering start to the year in the broad US stock market, emphasized in particular by, for example, the tech sector’s performance thus far.

Read more

The Value of Interpretation

by Plotinus Plotinus No Comments

The recent acknowledgement by Jerome Powell that the current phase of higher inflation is no longer transitory, is recognition by the Federal Reserve that the present, out of kilter, global supply chain system is going to take time to resolve itself. Thus determining what the prospect of longer-term higher inflation means for the cycle ahead is important from an investor’s perspective.

Read more